Re: [Linux-31] Pb de WebCam...

[Jean-Marc MONGRELET <jm.mongt AT gmail.com>]

Le 20/10/2020 10:16, jdanield a écrit :
> du coup, les logs devraient donner quelque chose...

Oui, y a des logs... Voila ce que dit le syslog:
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.516889] usb 1-8: new high-speed 
USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.690546] usb 1-8: New USB device 
found, idVendor=04f2, idProduct=b59d, bcdDevice=10.18
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.690551] usb 1-8: New USB device 
strings: Mfr=3, Product=1, SerialNumber=2
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.690554] usb 1-8: Product: 
Chicony USB2.0 Camera
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.690556] usb 1-8: Manufacturer: 
Chicony Electronics Co.,Ltd.
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.690558] usb 1-8: SerialNumber: 
200901010001
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.693574] uvcvideo: Found UVC 
1.00 device Chicony USB2.0 Camera (04f2:b59d)
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.702687] uvcvideo 1-8:1.0: 
Entity type for entity Extension 4 was not initialized!
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.702691] uvcvideo 1-8:1.0: 
Entity type for entity Processing 2 was not initialized!
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.702693] uvcvideo 1-8:1.0: 
Entity type for entity Camera 1 was not initialized!
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot kernel: [  259.702959] input: Chicony USB2.0 
Camera: Chicony  as 
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-8/1-8:1.0/input/input27
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot mtp-probe: checking bus 1, device 5: 
"/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-8"
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot mtp-probe: bus: 1, device: 5 was not an MTP 
device
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot mtp-probe: checking bus 1, device 5: 
"/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-8"
Oct 20 18:15:25 LDLCmagot mtp-probe: bus: 1, device: 5 was not an MTP 
device
Oct 20 18:15:28 LDLCmagot kernel: [  262.524961] usb 1-8: USB 
disconnect, device number 5


> l'avantage de cheese c'est qu'il est plus simple que VLC à faire
> fonctionner, il y a moins de risque d'erreur...

Oui... et puis surtout il était déjà installé! ;-)

JM